Use case check

Talk through one engineering workflow before choosing a pilot.

Use this route when the problem is real but the first AgentFoundry workflow is not obvious yet. Tell us about one engineering task, why it matters now, and what your team would need to see before trying a pilot.

What to bring

A real workflow, not a generic AI request.

Helpful requests include a repo or workflow description, current blocker, acceptance criteria, risk limits, and the results a human owner would need before deciding next.

Scoping questions

The first contact should clarify the problem, outcome, and next step.

AgentFoundry works best when the first request names a real job, owner, urgency, success condition, and approval rules. The contact flow captures enough context to decide whether to pilot, demo, connect through the API, or wait.

Workflow

What engineering job keeps repeating: issue-to-PR, failed checks, code review, dependency upgrades, release handoff, or docs drift?

Urgency

When does the pain matter: this week, this month, this quarter, or still exploring?

Outcome

What would make this useful: faster review, fewer repeated tasks, safer releases, clearer test results, or fewer silent failures?

Decision

Where must humans approve, stop, narrow, retry, or take over the run?

Engineering workflow conversation

Send the workflow, blocker, urgency, and desired outcome.

Choose “Workflow conversation” in the form if you want to scope the right first use case. Choose pilot, demo, or API access if that path is already clear.

Send one engineering job privately. We will review fit before proposing a narrow next step.